Skip to main content
R Restart
Browse catalogue My quotes Orders Returns Assets Quote draft Live B2B inventory · NET 30 on approval

Illustrative case study · Education

1,200 Chromebooks, on a grant budget, ready before day one of school.

A K-8 district's 1:1 refresh after four years of fleet drift — executed between mid-June and the first bell in mid-August. Names withheld until permission lands.

1,200 units
Grade A Chromebooks, spec-matched
$412/unit
All-in, including asset tagging
0 day-1 issues
Reported at district IT during week-one rollout

Customer

[K-8 public district, ~1,200 students across 3 campuses]. The 1:1 Chromebook fleet aged through COVID-era purchasing decisions and was losing units faster than loaners could absorb. IT had a grant window (ESSER pass-through from the state) that covered 1,200 units if pricing landed under [$425/unit].

The brief

  • 1,200 Chromebooks, 11" touch, Chromebook Plus spec band
  • Asset tag applied; bar-coded with district prefix
  • Matching charging carts? Quoted but out of scope
  • Delivery must land between June 15 and August 5
  • PO billing, NET 30, ESSER-compliant line-item format

What we did

Grant-compliant quote

Line-item format with funding codes mapped to the district's ESSER allocation structure. Submitted for board review within 3 business days.

Summer delivery window

Shipped in two waves: 600 units on June 18, 600 units on July 22. Both arrived before staff return, staged at the district's central receiving with barcoded pallets matching the bar-code master.

Multi-year warranty option

Standard 12-month extended to 36 months on 500 of 1,200 units for a flat premium, covering the units deployed to grades K-2 where mishandling risk is highest.

Outcome

1,200 units
Deployed by day one of school
$15K under budget
Vs. the grant cap
36-month coverage
On 500 most-vulnerable units
2% RMA rate
Over the first 9 months
"We had a hard deadline and a hard budget. The line-item quote matched our ESSER allocation, the asset tags were applied before the pallets hit receiving, and we came in $15K under."
[Director of Technology] · [K-8 public district]

What made this work

Education buying isn't general B2B procurement: the quote has to fit the funding source's line-item rules, the delivery has to fit the academic calendar (not the vendor's quarter), and the units have to land matched in cosmetic grade and battery health so a classroom of 25 doesn't have one obvious "bad" device. Grant-format quoting, scheduling around June-to-August windows, and matched-batch grading are what turned a tight grant into a clean rollout.

Refresh on a calendar that isn't yours?

We quote in grant format and ship in your delivery window.